Larry Woiwode’s “Winter” is certainly a unique piece in
terms of writing style. The detail I
noticed right away was the odd tense.
The opening phrase “In our seventeenth year on a farmstead” seems past
tense, yet it is soon followed up with present tense verbs (“I decide”), making
the voice seem passive throughout.
Woiwode is discussing the event as if it were presently happening, yet
he speaks from a distance, detailing events that have already occurred
(“unaware that we’re heading into the worst winter recorded in the state’s
history”). This makes for an interesting
structure, but also a clumsy one. It’s
as if the reader has their feet on each end of a seesaw, trying to keep a
balance as they read, the prose constantly switching between past and present. This removed me from the story multiple
times, if for no other reason but to try and keep my balance. I also think this style caused Woiwode’s
ending to suffer. The story was meant to
be suspenseful, the ending climactic, yet I felt the end was overwritten and
attempted to be more dramatic than the event really was. Perhaps it was language that bordered on
clichéd philosophies (“Life, brief as a breath, over?”), but I also think that
helter-skelter style had great impact.
We realize by this point in the narration that the events described have
already happened, yet Woiwode is still trying to pass them off as some
thrilling present. If he’s writing the
story about an event that has already occurred, we realized that he didn’t freeze
to death trying to fix his furnace, so his false “present” is unbelievable. If the story was told in plain present tense,
the events would have seemed more urgent and I could have gotten lost in the
excitement. Also, if the story was told
in the plain past tense, at least the piece wouldn’t have been trying to masquerade
as something it wasn’t, and I could have focused on the events and not my
skepticism.
You bring up some very interesting points with regards to the tense. I didn't really have an issue with it as much as you, but it does make me reflect on the tale differently. What I took away from the short wasn't whether or not he makes it, but why he does it. His answer is a resounding human and common reason that I think we all share, and that's to protect our families, as well as the human race in general. That said, I do understand the masquerade issue, and I do agree with that. That said, it wouldn't have been worth reading, in my opinion, if he would have just said, "I almost killed myself to save my family."
ReplyDelete